More on "Fake" Poker Accusations... (from a programmer)

I’m starting a new thread on this because I feel what I have to say about this is important enough to not be buried several comments down in an existing thread.

I’m a programmer and have worked on Poker software for over 20 years. If you go in a casino or cruise ship and see electronic poker being played, well, I built the prototype for that. I’m also a seasoned Poker player: both live games (especially in Vegas) and I used to play a LOT on online platforms back in the day (Party Poker, Poker Stars, etc.) mostly for real money when it was still allowed. I’m fairly new to Prominence Poker since purchasing an xbox for the family.

I’m seeing a few people on here complaining about the randomness of the deals and how they go all-in with AA and get beat on the river by some bozo with 72 off-suit. I’ll go into “randomness” more in a bit but I have to say that:

  1. This DOES happen in “real” live games, for real money, with real cards, in real casinos, on low limit games ALL THE TIME. Heck, it even happens in higher limit games.
  2. There is a HUGE difference between real games for real money and online play for play chips. If it happens enough in real games (per #1 above) then you can be sure it will happen EXPONENTIALLY MUCH MORE in play games where people are not risking their real money. Especially when the system is giving players free chips every day to just “try their luck” and go all-in with a terrible hand to try and multiply their stack quickly. I mean, what are they risking exactly by doing so?
  3. I don’t believe there’s an age limit for players. I think there’s a lot of kids (or people who know nothing about Poker) picking it up on xbox, steam, PS, whatever, and just messing around and truly not knowing how to play the game, or hand rankings, or when they should play a hand or have no business being in a hand. This further adds to the problems mentioned and I believe I witnessed this first hand last night with one player from whom I happily took their stack several times. I’m particularly talking about when you get a killer hand and raise big (or all-in) and someone calls you with ABSOLUTELY NOTHING… like not even a small pair, or a chance of getting a flush or straight or anything. At first I would scratch my head in wonder but then realized I was probably playing against some 8 year old that had no idea what they were doing. Sure, occasionally such players get lucky on the river sometimes but statistically I didn’t see this happen anywhere out of the ordinary.

So I think it’s safe to say that with any “play money” Poker environment, you’re going to see all kinds of bizarre behavior when it comes to other players.

Now onto randomness and cheating…

Computers do not have TRULY random generation. It’s generally called pseudo randomness for a reason. In it’s most basic form, a programmer will typically retrieve a pseudo random value by first “seeding” with (for example) the current time, then by calling a function such as rand(1,52) which will provide a pseudo random number between 1 and 52 inclusive.

However, this is seriously problematic… if the “seeding” is done at the same time of each day then people can figure out exactly what cards would be dealt next. This happened to one of the big well-known online Poker rooms back in the day (think it was Poker Stars… I can’t remember). After some smart people figured out that the seeding was being done exactly at midnight every day and they were able to figure out what cards would be dealt next.

There are algorithms that programmers can use to generate more random pseudo randomness. I did this with the aforementioned Poker software I developed years ago. Oh, and to make sure no seeding is done at repetitive times.

It is possible to get more TRUE randomness by using something truly random to seed the algorithm. One company does this (not a Poker company) by taking a photo of a wall full of lava lamps and seeding their algorithm with the results. Pretty inventive!

And to the person who said they got AA three times in a row… yes that’s possible. I’ve personally had AA twice in a row in a casino. The deck has no memory of the previous deal just like a coin has no memory of the previous flip or a roulette ball has no memory of the previous spin. Just because roulette falls black 102 times in a row doesn’t mean there’s more chance of it being red the next spin… the odds are still 50/50 (not accounting for the zero(s)).

I’m not sure what methods PP are using but I highly doubt they would be using the basic pseudo random generator that comes with C/C++.

Now onto cheating…

Is it possible: yes. Is it likely: no. Why? Because it’s not a “real” money game. I can’t see why anyone would go to the lengths involved for a play money game. One big online Poker room (I think it was Ultimate Bet) got caught cheating back in the days of “real” money online Poker. I think it was the owner’s son who had his own “backdoor” version of the software where he could see everyone’s hole cards. He got caught when people’s suspicions were raised. He got carried away and kind of made it obvious some funky business was going on.

Some of the other Poker products I had developed or worked on would have made it possible for me to cheat online play without even being affiliated with the Poker rooms. But I wouldn’t have even considered it because I know that anyone running WireShark (or similar) would’ve figured it out eventually. It just wouldn’t be worth it, and it would’ve killed my [highly profitable] products immediately.

So I highly doubt there’s cheating going on in PP. There’s not really anything to gain by doing so. Sure, you’ll get the bad beats and some idiotic play for the reasons mentioned above, and it may be frustrating and seem like something dubious is going on, but I still highly doubt it. When you get frustrated in such scenarios, just remember that the odds are always against people who play that way. I’ve seen it time and time again in real casino games, online play, and in PP.

Finally, I’d like to make a couple suggestions to make PP better. First and foremost, it would be nice if it was cross-platform. Or at the very least, if I could log in with the same character on Steam as I have in xbox. A cross-platform version would also get more players and involvement. Second, it would be great if there were “speed” tables. In other words, tables with a very limited time limit for players to make their move.

I’m sure I can think of much more stuff to make it better but this post is meant to make players feel a little better about the play on PP from a [Poker] programmer’s/player’s perspective.

If by chance PP needs any help or whatever to implement improvements or player’s suggestions I’d be happy to help wherever I can. I’m not asking for a job… I’m just willing to spend some of my time helping to make a better experience for all players and implement some of the excellent suggestions being put forth.


Thank you very much for your informative post!


Tyvm for the information and Mayor PP why not take him up on his offer what can it hurt. Plenty of us enjoy the game and live with the BS of bad players. I play it for practice with controlling my patience for when im playing tournaments in a REAL casino for REAL money. This again is FREE.
And its nice to see the updates and work on PP being done. If it moves you closer to a PP2 why not atleast have a dialog with him. My humble opinon.
Happy Healthy New Year to you your families and all the PP players.


Also here is a pretty good site that explains odds of hands dealt

1 Like

Great post! People get tilted and blame the game/call it cheating :joy:. Good ol poker will do that to a person lol


Ive stopped playing, but thanks for the post.

One of the (very few tbh) posts in these amateur forums. I would allow/let this guy to run for Prominence’ s mayor if I was Mr. Pipeworks. He seems willing to help into bringing some life in a well created poker body that unfortunately was taken for dead by it’s creators and left to rot, contrary to it’s fanbase’s hopes. (But on the other hand, what do I know, I don’t even know the guy and noone else in here. And I don’t wish to anyways. Perhaps the loner privilege is the main reason I love this game so much, 7-2 in a 5 mil table, all in, cut throat emote while loosing, fantastic me, yay!) Greetings ^^

1 Like

It’s tough for the developers when the game is free. If your product isn’t earning enough revenue to justify spending a great deal of time and money developing it further it can be a tough call. On the other side of the coin, if the game wasn’t free, you would then have people complaining that there’s never enough players to play with online.

Perhaps some more inventive ways to earn money from it would help the developers? I know people can buy extra chips and whatnot but maybe there could be a paid version of the software where there’s exclusive rooms for the paid players? I’m just shooting ideas out there.

I’ve been messing around more with the software and I see that the higher the stakes, the [slightly] better the play. Which makes sense. But still seeing plenty of people going all-in with nothing such as three-card-straights on the flop, runner-runner flush draws, or literally nothing.

So here’s another idea… perhaps there should be “spread” tables, or tables where you can only go all-in so many times in a limited time period.

For those who don’t know what spread tables are, they’re not “limit” or “no-limit” but they’re tables where you can bet anywhere in a certain range/limit (eg. 50 thru 500 chips). And, just like in most casinos, players can go all-in when it’s down to heads-up. Such tables should be very easy to implement and add to the software and I think would attract more serious players who are tired of those who just want to play “poker lottery” by going all-in every hand.

Not so sure how the “limited # of all-ins within time period” idea would work but if players could only go all-in once every five minutes then perhaps they would use them more wisely.

Again, I’m just throwing ideas/thoughts around.


Great ideas, now I’m just spitballing here but maybe add more packs? And charge more for the 3.5 million pack… like at least $100 for that pack(might have to add .5 mil to it or deduct .5 off all packs), they could add a 2 Mil $50 pack, 1 Mil for $25, etc… but basically I agree they need to make money for us to get great content. Lastly if I could point you over to the “Feature Request” topic section this post would be great there!! :slight_smile:

1 Like

Yes absolutely! I’ll post the suggestions in the relevant thread :slight_smile:

Thank you so much! That’s great!

To the OP,
Excellent feedback, amigo. Especially in bringing up often overlooked yet obvious factors such as risk and players.

The majority of game reviews all complain about the array. It’s unrealistic to a noticeable degree when 4 suited cards are on the table 30% of a game.

Yet the quickest remedy to this perception, when considering those valid points you brought up, is to add a seasonal bad beat jackpot.

Rendering bad beats palatable and not only encouraging return play but increasing enthusiasm. (Credit to Farmer John for leading to that exceptional idea, albeit inadvertently :heart_eyes:).

Also, to reiterate, selling custom attire and accessories is a large revenue stream on other games especially among young players, so why isn’t PP taking advantage of this?

Thank you

1 Like

Yeah something more than just a few REP points for bad beats would be nice! Casinos do this all the time such as immediate payouts for bad beat aces and/or a running bad beat jackpot when a killer hand (quads or better) gets crushed.

1 Like